cajeck
New Member
The pirate pill...yar.
Posts: 3
|
Post by cajeck on Feb 22, 2011 23:37:06 GMT -6
So I've often wondered what the limit was for the reader when it comes to matters of the undefined. By this, I mean, leaving the reader in the dark about certain things so that they aren't bombarded with info dropping, of the especially useless variety. For instance in Harry Potter, JK Rowling frequently made mention of magical feats achieved by auxiliary characters, but she never bothered to go in depth about how those spells were cast and what for. In this case, her esoterics made the wizarding world seem all that more wondrous.
But then I've personally been faced with the issue of how much should be left to question? Can you forgive it, if you feel it doesn't affect plot very much?
In my fantasy serial, the characters often encounter strange and spiritual things--beings that are compelled by forces too old and powerful to understand--places that defy all physical law and science. I could explain why it is a one-eyed spirit blows raspberries at people and stacks rocks by trees, and I could explain why it is that the universe has a dream, but it would kill the mystique, wouldn't it?
I just wanted to hear from you folks. Where do you draw the line? What do you feel is asking too much of your readers, and how much should we trust our audience to accept the fantasy?
|
|